Infertility is a pervasive issue that affects a significant portion of the population—approximately one in six individuals will encounter this struggle at some point in their lives. Alarmingly, many do not anticipate that they will be among those affected. Projections indicate that around 6.5 million people in the United States will face infertility challenges in the coming year alone.
As an OB/GYN Physician Assistant with a decade of experience in the field of infertility, I have witnessed firsthand the emotional toll, financial burden, and overall distress that accompany this journey. The general public’s lack of awareness regarding infertility is often startling, particularly when individuals, especially women, make choices that could undermine their own interests. This year, the implications of infertility treatment and care are at stake, as the Republican Party’s 2024 policy agenda supports states establishing fetal personhood under the 14th Amendment.
The debate surrounding In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) has become closely linked to the contentious discourse around abortion. This connection is fueled by alarming rhetoric from far-right conservatives advocating for fetal personhood, which posits that life begins at fertilization. This perspective gained traction following a ruling by the Alabama Supreme Court in February, classifying frozen embryos as children.
Should fetal personhood laws come into effect, fertility clinics might reconsider the viability of performing IVF due to the heightened risk associated with embryo destruction, which would now be equated with harming a child. Fertility specialists may be forced to limit fertilization to a single egg at a time, significantly driving up costs and creating additional barriers for individuals seeking IVF.
Currently, there are over 1.5 million frozen embryos in the U.S., and proposed anti-abortion measures pose a threat to these embryos. For instance, couples who feel their family is complete may find themselves compelled to transfer, donate, or indefinitely store unused embryos, eliminating their personal choice regarding embryo disposition. Moreover, the ability to test embryos for genetic abnormalities could be severely restricted, as any potential damage to an embryo during testing could be viewed as a violation of fetal personhood laws. Additionally, transferring embryos across state lines could potentially be interpreted as human trafficking under such definitions.
The unfortunate reality is that many individuals remain unaware of their potential struggles with infertility. There is no way to predict who will face these challenges. With one in six individuals affected, it is crucial to recognize that the future of family planning for ourselves and others may be at risk.
Reproductive rights and infertility management should be free from governmental interference; however, the current political climate, particularly the Republican stance, threatens the future of fertility treatments in the United States. The far right relies on a lack of understanding regarding the risks and implications of their policies.
This serves as a call to action: engage in discussions with friends and family who may not fully grasp the ramifications of this election on reproductive health, including the crucial issue of infertility. It is essential to ensure that we do not inadvertently vote against our own interests and those of our families as we approach the polls.
Related topics:
